The Strange Case of Book Trailers

Rick Beerhorst  Humming Bird Girl  2009

If more book trailers had surreal images like this I'd probably be more interested in them

Book trailers seem to be increasing in popularity. I still remember some of James Patterson’s book trailers on TV, my “favorite” being the one for Suzanne’s Diary for Nicholas, where James Patterson pretends he can write Nicholas Sparks’ type books. I have hopes that this trailer will one day make its way onto youtube so that I can share its amazing awesomeness with the world. More often than not, however, book trailers are confined to the internet. But I wonder, how effective are they? A lot of these trailers seem to be trying to do the impossible — merge two forms of media that don’t necessarily work together.

Take a look at this book trailer for Anthropology of an American Girl, a book I read long before seeing the trailer. I’m not sure if that does anything for the book really. I suppose it creates an atmosphere, that’s not entirely inaccurate, but mostly it’s just blurbs set to a piano melody (we’ve been over the whole, hey I’m a sucker for piano thing right? Right.)

Then of course there’s the hilarious Super Sad True Love Story trailer that has fuck all to do with the book really.

BLANK LINE

Then there’s this Beautiful Creatures trailer, which is intriguing in parts, but in my opinion goes on for too long and has some really unnecessary shots that don’t add anything (this is a book I’ve been interested in reading for some time by the way, but again, not because of the trailer).

BLANK LINE

This trailer for The Liar’s Diary intrigued me but not the trailer itself so much as the synopsis revealed through the text of the trailer. I probably would have been just as intrigued if I’d read the jacket copy (especially since I found myself wishing the text would move faster and barely caring about what was on the screen).

BLANK LINE

It seems like, more than anything, book trailers create a mood. Or impart information through the text. The latter I’d rather turn to the synopsis for. The former I understand a bit better but I’m still not sure it’s enough to get me to buy the book. What’s your take on book trailers? Do you have any favorites or least favorites? Do you feel they’re effective? Has one ever made you buy a book?

How Much Is Too Much?

Poetry Reading by Irene Sheri

How much is too much? I began writing this post months ago, but eventually discarded it because I thought it sounded too whiny. I suspect part of it will still sound too whiny but I’ve decided to apply the topic to two separate issues, so hopefully it won’t be as whiny as it was originally.

1) Is there such a thing as too much [lit] publicity? I recently told Gillian that I was starting to hate David Foster Wallace because it seems he’s everywhere (and has been since his suicide). Now obviously I don’t mean physically but the sheer number of articles about him, his legacy, and that one time he sneezed have gotten to be too much for me. I’m sick of him, and I haven’t even read him yet. For every article devoted to DFW, add another year before I’ll be willing to read any of his work. It’s not just Wallace, though (and in his case, I at least get it). It’s also the way certain publishers tend to hype up certain authors/books. I can’t help but notice that some publishers constantly retweet anything and everything (positive) having to do with the same few books/authors. It actually has a negative effect on me (i.e. I have no desire to buy these books). I can’t say that promotion doesn’t work on me at all, but it seems to work better on me when it’s subtle and not in my face. But I know that not everyone feels the same way. So what’s your limit? At what point does promotion (or hype) become too much for you?

2) I’ve been toying with the idea of doing longer, more in depth (and occasionally spoilery) reviews for a while now. I really love I Read Odd Books‘ reviews and though I don’t think I could ever be as thorough as she is, I find the time she takes with each review to be pretty awesome. On the other hand, sometimes I don’t have as much to say about a particular book. I’m also concerned I wouldn’t be able to review as many books. But when I originally decided to review as many books as possible it was meant to make me a better reader, to engage and put into words what I did and didn’t like about a book. It seemed like good editorial practice. I feel as though people are less likely to read longer reviews and I don’t want to ostracize the few readers I have. We’ll see I guess. But tell me readers, when does a review become too long for you to read?

Harry Potter, Books 4 and 5


Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
I CAN HAS EDITOR PLEASE?! What. A. Mess. In GOF, the mystery is so intricate, it borders on convoluted. Oh what the hell, it IS convoluted, and not always plausible. Barty Crouch’s personality doesn’t jive with his actions. You’re a hardass and a TOTAL stickler for the rules, you’ve renounced your son for his death eater ways, but you let your wife convince you that it’s a good idea to break him out of Azkaban? IS THIS FOR REAL? His wife takes polyjuice potion the entire year she’s in Azkaban under the guise of her son. Um… doesn’t polyjuice potion need to be brewed once it’s finished? What the hell, did Barty stick her in there with a cauldron’s worth? I’m supposed to believe Winky the House Elf would actually have the gumption to make suggestions regarding Barty Crouch, Jr.? Why did Voldemort need to wait until the final round of the Triwizard tournament to use Harry? I mean wasn’t that kind of risky? Despite Fake Moody’s efforts, Harry might not have won. What then? Really, couldn’t you have just turned Harry’s comb into a portkey and called it a day? Oh wait, my bad. Storylines have to take an entire school year or else they’re no good. SORRY FOLKS, GO BACK TO YOUR READING.

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
Oddly enough, OOTP seems to suffer from the opposite problem of GOF. Still entirely too long but with very little information contributing to the central plot. Hundreds of pages go by before we’re reminded that Oh, right! there’s a SECRET WEAPON out there. Our clues never go beyond Harry walking and reaching toward a door. Oddly enough this is exactly how I felt sitting in the movie theater. I enjoyed the film and even went to see it a second time, but the prophesy, once revealed, is sort of anti-climactic (in fact, I find it utterly ridiculous that Harry couldn’t figure out for himself that he’d probably have to kill Voldemort himself IF ONLY because this guy keeps coming after you again and again. I mean really, WHAT DO YOU THINK IS GOING TO HAVE TO HAPPEN?!). Also, um, why wasn’t anyone from the Order patrolling the ministry after dark? Or was that whole fight a lot earlier in the day than I thought? Also, I’m not buying the excuse for why Voldemort didn’t just go get the prophesy himself. One of the greatest wizards of all time can’t figure out how to get in and out of the ministry after dark without being seen? I can just see Voldemort being all like BITCH, PLEASE! Meanwhile, the rest of the novel is just…SO MUCH, and could also use a good dose of editing. I find myself interested, but not entirely sure why X, Y, or Z matters or moves the plot forward, even over the stretch of the series.

In other news, Snape continues to be an insufferable asshole. And here’s hoping CAPSLOCK!Harry is gone for good.

Despite my criticisms, I did enjoy both books, but I do think they would have been a lot stronger if they had been trimmed down.

Borders, Y U NO

Borders, Y U NO HAVE WHAT I WANT? I went to Borders on Wednesday. Aside from the fact that I STILL can’t find the music (books) section, my trip was mostly disappointing. I’m trying to hold out until prices really drop (70%?) and since I had a fair bit of success during my last Borders Going Out of Business outing in April, I’m confident that I’ll be able to find some good stuff during the last days (my taste is just slightly off enough to make this possible). Blu Rays are currently 40% off though and I thought, hey maybe I can find Tangled at a discount. But alas, NO TANGLED :( Mind you, there were some other quality titles, but not that one. Then I thought maybe I’d get Pretty Little Liars at 20% off (the show’s gotten awful and I’m just sticking with it to find out who A is and/or who killed Alison at this point), but they only had Books 1 and 4. And Book 1 was the TV Tie in Edition, and well, that’s an abomination in my opinion. Then I tried for Libba Bray’s Gemma Doyle Trilogy. They had Book 1…and nothing else -.- Also thought I’d try and complete my Luxe series. HA! They had plenty of Book 2 (remember that’s the one they had left the first round of Borders closings too), but no Book 3 or 4. *sigh* I mean FFS Borders! HELP ME OUT HERE! (btw, I stuck to YA because YA books are cheaper than Adult Fiction anyway. I will not buy fiction at Borders for anything less than 50% off because I might as well go to the Strand or Housing Works otherwise). In the end, I bought one YA book that’s it.

A disappointing outing indeed.

Harry Potter, the First Three Books

So I read the first three books in four days, and I’m pausing so that my mom can catch up. So now seems like a good time to share my thoughts and perhaps be raked over the coals by die-hards. Spoilers abound since everyone who wasn’t born in the last 3 years has probably read them.

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone
The first time I attempted to read HP, I didn’t get past the first chapter. It didn’t seem bad but I just…didn’t care to go any further and so I put the book down. That was, I don’t know, lots of years ago. This time I pushed myself over the hump, and really the book is not bad and I can understand why people like it though I don’t think I’m ever going to be one of those diehard fans (but who knows? maybe the later books will change my mind). Liked the little extras that were left out of the film though to be fair, this film is the closest to the book so far.

Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
It’s possible my opinion will change as I keep reading but this is still the worst one for me (and I feel the same about the film). Now mind you I read it faster than the first book — it reads just fine, but the reason I don’t like this one is that I just don’t think the main story makes a whole lot of sense. Look, Harry can speak to and understand snakes, and no one else at Hogwarts can (except Rowling revealed Dumbledore could understand Parseltongue so ummmm???). I get that. What I don’t get is why no one else can hear the snake HISSING through the walls. If it’s loud enough for Harry to hear then it should be loud enough for others to hear even if they don’t understand what’s being said. Not to mention that this huge fucking Basilisk is traveling through the pipes…you mean to tell me the walls wouldn’t be shaking? Last but not least “Nearly Headless Nick isn’t dead so he couldn’t die again, instead he got petrified,” might just be the dumbest thing ever, I’m sorry. And how the hell does he manage to drink the mandrake antidote when he’s a ghost? Yeah, probably should’ve just left the ghost out of this one.

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
The third film has always been my favorite story-wise though I find the fourth to be the funniest and the fourth is probably the one I’ve seen the most. I also knew that a LOT was left out of the third film…probably at the expense of a snow shot or the whomping willow dusting itself off or some such other nonsense. It’s the shortest film after Deathly Hallows, Part 2. Honestly even 10 more minutes probably would’ve made a huge difference. Reading this one has been the most enjoyable so far though because it’s quite different from the film. Oddly enough I think the circular nature of time-travel was handled a little better in the film than the book (all this time I’d been crediting Rowling with this, but it seems it was more the decision of the screenwriter and/or director). Also this film introduces us to what I call: RIDDLE DUMBLEDORE, or first Dumbledore actor died and we replaced him with this dude who wears rags says little and means less. Thankfully RIDDLE DUMBLEDORE was less riddly in the fourth film though he did suffer from ASDFGHJKL; SYNDROME (see right panel).

Something that bugs me about both Books 2 and 3: explaining / repeating information from previous books. I get that these can somewhat serve as reminders, but seriously, it’s tiresome and Rowling gives up too much information, even considering there was a year between each book.

Favorite characters thus far: Hagrid, Fred and George Weasley
Least Favorite characters thus far: Snape (like holy cow did the films tone him down), Peeves (not only do I find him annoying but he actually just seems like a waste of ink to me), the Dursleys (just ugh)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 96 other followers