Top Ten Books I Had VERY Strong Emotions About

Yet another Top Ten Tuesday I swore I’d get done on time…as always brought to you by The Broke and the Bookish. The topic for this week: Top Ten Books I Had VERY Strong Emotions About

1. The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger Only the second time around did I find myself emotional over this book, but I won’t rehash that here since I reviewed it earlier this year.

2. Here on Earth by Alice Hoffman I think this is the only Oprah’s Book Club pick I’ve ever read. It was on sale at the library and I took it home with me. It was all beat up naturally. I read it…and even though I know I shouldn’t feel sorry for the person I’m crying for, I do all the same.

3. A Separate Peace by John Knowles WHY FINNY WHY *sob*

4. The Bitch Posse by Martha O’Connor So the book that changed the way I choose books also had me BAWLING like a baby in the last chapter.

5. The Ice Queen by Alice Hoffman You know I didn’t like this book all that much but I found myself crying toward the end.

6. Gone With the Wind by Margaret Mitchell The ending to this book broke my heart in ways the movie never could. While I do feel Clark Gable is perfect in the role of Rhett Butler, the final scene between Rhett and Scarlett is so much sadder in the book, and even when he says “My dear, I don’t give a damn” (that’s right, there was no frankly in the book), it’s in such a defeated tone, and not the sardonic “Get bent, Wench!” tone that’s taken on in the film.

7. The Bad Seed by William March So I forgot to include this book in my Top 10 Disturbing Books list. I remember being really disturbed at a certain part and just flinging the book aside because I couldn’t deal. To be fair, the book isn’t particularly graphic but there’s one brief description that’s never left my mind.

8. American Psycho by Bret Easton Ellis Oh infamous rat scene! Let’s just say that was NOT the scene I was most horrified by, probably because I had already heard about it. Oh no, I was deeply disgusted by another scene that literally caused me to fling the book away and squirm around a lot.

9. Flowers for Algernon by Daniel Keys Cheating a bit with this one as I haven’t actually read more than a couple of pages. Why? Because I KNOW me. There are two guaranteed ways to make me cry while reading: 1) kill off a dog 2) write about someone who is mentally challenged (this is one of the reasons I cannot deal with Of Mice and Men either). I’ve only read a bit toward the end of this novel, but it had me practically bawling in the middle of the bookstore…so I think it’s safe to say I won’t be touching this one….ever.

10. The Age of Innocence by Edith Wharton You know what Edith? I love you, but fuck you and your gutwrenching endings!

Characters and Literary Figures I’d Name My Children After

All right, so yesterday’s Top Ten topic was one I’d actually done months ago: Ten Books I’d Like to Reread. I was thinking of adding another 10 books to the list and posting that but I couldn’t think of anything beyond Madame Bovary and The Second Sex (both for the newer translations). I’ve fallen into something of a reading slump (I’m reading but ridiculously slowly…because it’s Fall and that’s how I roll in the Fall apparently), which means nothing to review. Anyway, I tweeted yesterday that I plan to name all the children I have no intention of having after Salinger characters. Now today I see that there’s an old Top 10 topic from February called Characters (and Literary Figures) That I’d Name My Children After so I figured I’d do that…even though I have no plans to have children.

1. Franny (Frances) from Franny and Zooey – well I’ve said many a time that Franny Glass is my homegirl.

2. Zooey from Franny and Zooey – this one’s short for Zachary but I’d probably just name the kid Zooey. Jury is out on whether or not I’d use this for a boy or girl. Either way, I’d definitely pronounce it Zoo-ey, not Zoe-y

3. Holden from The Catcher in the Rye – I have this itching desire to name a GIRL Holden to be honest. And why not? I mean, what the hell is a Holden anyway?

4. Boo Boo from “Down at the Dinghy” (Nine Stories) + numerous mentions in other Glass stories – You know, Boo Boo is such a ridiculous name for a child, and to be fair, it’s only her nickname (real name is Beatrice), but I always thought there should be more Boo Boo Glass, so this would be my homage to her.

5. Esmé from “For Esmé — With Love and Squalor” (Nine Stories) – more ridiculous Salinger names.

6. Salinger – middle name? I don’t know but I’m on a Salinger theme here so I figured I’d might as well keep it up and yeah I have actually thought about this.

OK, and now for some non-Salinger related names

7.Sylvia after Sylvia Plath – Actually I’ve always liked the name Sylvia

8. Eveline from Anthropology of an American Girl – Eveline, called Evie throughout most of the novel, seems like a pretty name

9. Marcheline from Here on Earth – For short, she’s called March…never thought of using the month of March as a girl’s name until this book!

10. Gemma from A Great and Terrible Beauty – name of one of my favorite fashion models as well so it’s a natural choice (even though I spent a couple of years pronouncing it with a hard G sound for some reason)

On Hating the Classics

Hester Prynne is not amused.

Or some of them at least. Lately I’ve been noticing that the same classics seem to get hated on regularly. Now, classics, being what they are and the level of esteem they’ve been afforded by critics, will always have their detractors. Anything that is hyped that much will inevitably lead to disappointment for a sector of the population. But there are certain books that I keep seeing over and over again:

Jane Austen*
The Catcher in the Rye
Lord of the Flies
The Scarlet Letter
A Separate Peace
Wuthering Heights

While I can’t speak for all of Jane Austen (because I haven’t read all her work), I did like both Pride & Prejudice and Sense & Sensibility. I’ve also liked the next four books listed…a lot actually. I struggled through the early chapters of Wuthering Heights but 1) I haven’t finished it so I can’t judge 2) I actually had a problem with the writing style which I don’t hear people complaining about so much when it comes to WH. But I wonder, why do these novels seem to get so much flak while a novel like The Picture of Dorian Gray gets almost none at all?

Jane Austen, fucks not given

With Jane Austen, I hate to be one of those “OMG YOU JUST DON’T GET IT!!!1!” people, but so much of the criticism launched at her does seem to stem from a gross misreading of her work, or at least a very limited reading (notice I said much not all). I can’t help but feel that some of the hatred is a backlash against an over-saturation of Jane Austen in the form of sequels, spinoffs, and re-tellings (understandable though entirely unfair)**. And the criticism is specifically aimed at Austen herself, not so much her individual books (I’m sure P&P has plenty of detractors but just think of Naipaul’s comment about Miss Austen being sentimental… comments like that are aimed at her all the time).

With the other five books, most people seem to hate the characters and/or think the story is absolutely miserable/horrible/boring, with The Scarlet Letter being the worst offender of them all because apparently it offends on all grounds.

I’ve been noticing this for some time but decided to blog about it because Courtney of Paper Darts wrote this humorous post on books she didn’t finish in high school and how she assumes they ended: True Lies and three of the aforementioned offenders were on this list. I was not at all surprised to find those three books on her list of unfinished works. The post is great by the way, and I do quite like her ending to A Separate Peace because OMG FINNY *wails*

What causes a classic to garner stronger negative reactions than others? Why do these books seem to be more polarizing than others? And why is it that disliking The Picture of Dorian Gray results in a load of vitriol spewed at you? (being called a neanderthal for not liking a book is always fun).

*Jane Austen is obviously not a book.
**I don’t actually have a problem with them per se but there are SO. MANY.

Wrap-Up: A Month of J.D. Salinger

• I own another edition of Franny and Zooey (not pictured), that is designed like my copy of The Catcher in the Rye.

• I broke the spine of my copy of The Catcher in the Rye. I might have to replace my copy because um, no. Broken spines are a no-no.

• There seems to be the belief that Holden Caulfield’s voice isn’t really all that unique, that all Salinger’s characters sound like that. I would have to basically disagree with this sentiment. While Salinger does have a very particular style that is present throughout all of his work1, Holden’s voice is very different from the Glass children for example. And seeing as how the Glasses occupy two full books as well as a couple of stories in Nine Stories, the comparison is relevant and covers almost all of Salinger’s published work that is still in print and readily available to the average audience. The Glasses are a very intelligent, precocious lot, with a vocabulary to match. Holden’s vocabulary is decidedly limited (and he says as much early on). He repeats himself a lot, sometimes within the span of just a few pages, and sometimes even within the same sentence. For example, when he meets up with one of his former teachers he says, “…I sort of missed them. I mean I sort of missed them.” This sort of repetition is peppered throughout the entire novel (and that doesn’t even address the fact that Holden constantly repeats the word really and phony). He also uses certain words incorrectly, and I don’t think it’s simply a reflection of words being used differently back in the late 40s and 50s. It’s a matter of Holden being a fairly typical teenager using who uses imprecise means of expressing himself. The Glasses don’t speak that way. They’re almost too smart for that nonsense, and while they’re trademark Salinger one can’t really accuse them of ever sounding unintelligent.

• Sometime last year I spoke (somewhat angrily) about the very idea of adapting The Catcher in the Rye into a film. My feelings on the matter have not changed, but I would like to quote from a letter Salinger wrote in 1957 about the matter

I keep saying this and nobody seems to agree, but The Catcher in the Rye is a very novelistic novel. There are readymade scenes – only a fool would deny that – but, for me, the weight of the book is in the narrator’s voice, the non-stop peculiarities of it, his personal, extremely discriminating attitude to his reader-listener, his asides about gasoline rainbows in street puddles, his philosophy or way of looking at cowhide suitcases and empty toothpaste cartons – in a word, his thoughts. He can’t legitimately be separated from his own first-person technique. True, if separation is forcibly made, there is enough material left over for something called an Exciting (or maybe just Interesting) Evening in the Theater. But I find that idea if not odious, at least odious enough to keep me from selling the rights. There are many of his thoughts, of course, that could be labored into dialogue – or into some stream-of-consciousness loudspeaker device – but labored is exactly the right word….

• This is exactly how I feel. It’s one of these novels that is so reliant on the narrative, the idiosyncrasies of the character’s speech and more importantly thoughts, that I can’t see a reasonable way for this to be done without botching it completely. The letter in question can be read in its entirety here.

• I think The Catcher in the Rye should have been one chapter shorter, ending with Holden watching his sister Phoebe on the carousel. Mind you the last chapter is less than a page but I think it’s unnecessary. Then again, when did Holden ever know when to shut up? I suppose it’s perfect the way it is.

• I didn’t make a separate post on the 22 uncollected short stories I read because in general, I don’t review short stories, and I don’t consider it a collection…due to the fact that, it’s not. That said, I really enjoyed them, even “Hapworth 16, 1924,” which most people seem to find objectionable. But I actually found a lot of the lines to be amusing including “a revolting fork is a revolting fork” and “Do not trample too quickly on stupid books!” It was, however, entirely too long. It ends three times essentially — the first time, Seymour finds more paper (I became dismayed at this point), then again when Buddy walks in, then finally it ends for real after what’s essentially a post script. I had a moment of IS THIS A JOKE?! after the second ending failed to actually bring the letter to a close.

• On February 18, I made the pilgrimage to Princeton University and took a look at the five unpublished works they house at the Firestone Library. I managed to read “The Children’s Echelon” and “The Last and Best of the Peter Pans.” I left the remaining stories, (“The Magic Foxhole,” “Two Lonely Men,” and the most famous of the unpublished works, “The Ocean Full of Bowling Balls”) for another visit.

• I think this photograph taken by Antony Di Gesu is cute.

• I both enjoy and mourn the fact that I have now read every Salinger work in print. But at least I still have a few more stories to look forward to.

1. Are there authors, particularly good ones, who don’t have a unique style and voice? An author’s voice is always present. The voice of a character is always distilled through the voice of the author, which is why two authors can accurately capture the voice of a child yet still sound completely different.

Book Review: The Catcher in the Rye

Title: The Catcher in the Rye
Author: J.D. Salinger
Format: Trade Paper
Publisher: Penguin Books
Pub Date: 1951; this edition: 2010
Read: re-read: Feb 2011; first read: Spring 1999
Purchased: amazon.co.uk
Why: Shortly after Salinger’s death, Penguin rushed these new editions to print. When I saw these gorgeous editions were coming out, I patiently waited for them to arrive in stores so I could purchase them. It finally dawned on me that in the United States, Little, Brown and Company publishes Salinger’s books, not Penguin. So I just went ahead and ordered The Catcher in the Rye from the UK Amazon site (along with Franny and Zooey). Would have ordered Nine Stories as well but it’s called For Esme — With Love and Squalor in the UK (and in most parts of the world) which oddly enough kind of offends me. There’s something ridiculous and charming about the collection being known as Nine Stories I think.
Fulfills Challenge? Technically it fulfills the Classics Challenge but since I read this one before, I’m not going to count it. I almost don’t even want to count it as part of my overall challenge, but since I am reading cover to cover, it’s been over 10 years, and I don’t remember any of it, I’m going to let this one slide.

Notes: I first read The Catcher in the Rye while I was in junior high, eighth grade to be exact. My eighth grade teacher, Mr Greene, hyped it up quite a bit. I remember four things from my original reading of The Catcher in the Rye. 1) that Holden Caulfield is in a psychiatric hospital (this is something people always seem to forget) 2) the phrase “terrific silence” because that’s the first time I learned that terrific had two, basically opposite meanings 3) the scene with the prostitute (specifically that he doesn’t go through with it) 4) the catcher in the rye scene. I pretty much forgot / misremembered everything else (I remembered he had a sister for example, but I thought she was older. I remembered his remarks about inferiority complexes but I remembered them wrong, etc).

Last year, a customer asked me what the book was about and I just kind of looked at her. The question confused me … “Who cares what it’s about?!” I almost exclaimed. Instead I mumbled something about it being a coming of age story of sorts because that seemed like a better response than “how the fuck should I know?” I’m sure my lovely readers would agree I made the right decision.

Review/Thoughts:
If I have ever in the past remarked that this novel is overrated (I probably did at some point, mostly because my teacher hyped it to the point where one was bound to be disappointed and think, so that’s it?) I take it back. I take it all back.

I know when many people read (or re-read) The Catcher in the Rye as an adult they find Holden Caulfield to be absolutely insufferable, even if they sympathized with him as a young adult. And nowadays it seems fewer and fewer young adults relate to him. What’s interesting to me is that it seems my getting older has had the opposite effect. I find him more relatable now than I did when I was 14.

And yes, in many ways Holden Caulfield is phony, though despite his harsh criticisms of phonies, I don’t recall his denying it about himself. He openly admits to being a liar as early as Chapter 3. Are people then surprised by his lying and contradictory information later on? I also think Holden’s phoniness is fairly typical of your average teen. It is often the case that when emotions run high, something can be true one moment, and false the next. I can be best friends with this person one day and want to gouge her eyes out the next and then a week later be the best of friends again.

But oddly enough, there is a genuineness underneath the layer of phoniness. And the truth always comes out sooner or later, often by his own admission. It is clear that he cares –despite everything he might say to the contrary — he cares very deeply. Even with things as simple as his concern over where the Central Park ducks go when the pond freezes over you can see that he does care about things. His loneliness and feelings of isolation are palpable even before he says he’s lonely. His love for his sister and his deceased brother (and children in general) is also apparent. He may not like anything else but Phoebe and Allie are important to him (as is Jane Gallagher, whom he is entirely too afraid to speak to). His description of Allie’s death is probably one of the most heartbreaking passages in the novel, the utter hollowness of the phrase “He’s dead now” was crushing to me.

I felt genuine discomfort more times than I can count (jeez, I don’t recall being this uncomfortable when I first read it) due to some secondhand embarrassment — moments when you just want to say, Oh, please don’t do that, you’re making a fool out of yourself. I also found myself chuckling at certain scenes, yet I also found the book to be incredibly sad. Throughout I felt myself getting emotional and then I just started crying when he drops Phoebe’s record and it shatters into pieces but he picks up the pieces anyway and pockets them. That he thought of his little sister in the first place is touching, to then have that thoughtfulness shatter in an instant, was just a little too much for me. I also don’t remember being this upset the first time around, but I’m older now somehow even more prone to crying than I was when I was younger.

Well, in the awkward words of Holden Caulfield, “[t]hat’s all I’m going to tell about.”

Final Verdict:

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 96 other followers